mocoNews.net - Unhealthily Obsessed with Mobile Content

Current Story

MocoNews Review With Video: AT&T’s MediaFLO Is Best Chance For Mobile TV To Take Off

By Tricia Duryee - Mon 12 May 2008 08:00 PM PST

The just-launched AT&T (NYSE: T) Mobile TV service is so good I watched the two-hour long 1982 comedy The Toy, featuring Richard Pryor without even really realizing it. In retrospect, I can see why mobile TV has been slow to take off—images are blurry, people are pixelated and lips and actions don’t sync with the soundtrack, and there’s long waits for loading and buffering. But this new service that AT&T has launched changes that because it doesn’t stream it over the cellular network. The service makes me believe that people will eventually watch TV on their mobile phone. Last week AT&T launched Qualcomm’s (NSDQ: QCOM) MediaFlo service, which is already being offered by Verizon Wireless (NYSE: VZ). The service uses broadcast methods, like the TV in your living room with rabbit ears. It does not use the cellular network. So far, it’s been slow for consumers to take off, but that’s most likely because it’s offered on a limited number of handsets, and it can be argued that up until now, they’ve been less than attractive phones. The cost might be another reason, but at $15 a month, it’s doable.

Video is below. (RSS readers will have to click through.)

FW: - Share on Ovi

More of the review after the jump

Enter the LG Vu… Last Saturday, the packaged arrived on my doorstep (Sorry, I’m not the type to post pictures of me taking it out of the box). The slim, touchscreen phone is iPhone-like. It’s nice, and easily stored in your pocket, but it has the twist—TV service. On May 4, AT&T turned on the service, offering stations, including CNN Mobile, PIX (a movie station showing a lot of flicks from the 80s), NBC2GO, NBCNEWS2GO, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, MTV, CNN Mobile, ESPN (NYSE: DIS) Mobile, Fox Mobile and CBS mobile. It’s in 58 markets already, including Seattle (where I’m testing it), Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York, San Diego, and Washington, D.C.

What works:
-- The quality: Other than a few stalls, blips and skips, which were more like what you would experience on your home TV, rather than the internet, It worked great—even when driving down the street. I didn’t check-out the coverage areas, but within the city, the service was flawless.
-- The variety: Going into it, I was a little concerned that it would be hard to find something to watch given that the service is live—you don’t get to choose what program you wanted to watch, or when you wanted to watch it. But that didn’t seem to be a problem. It had a little something for everyone. At any given time, the options could include: Late Night with Conan O’Brien (in the middle of the day), soaps, children’s content, or the movie Karate Kid.
-- Easy-to-use: It’s a one-touch operation from the main screen with up and down arrows that quickly flip through stations. A program guide was available, much like for cable TV, but that seemed unnecessary (there’s not THAT many stations).

What doesn’t work:
-- On play-back: Call me spoiled, but I’m used to my DVR, and recording shows, and then watching them whenever I want to, or pausing the show and coming back to it later (which would happen a lot when you are mobile). Considering that phones can have a lot of memory, this seems like a no-brainer to build in...perhaps that will eventually come?
-- Traveling: The service costs $15 a month, but you wouldn’t be able to watch it on an airplane, which would be an obvious time where it would come in handy. Once again, a DVR-like service would solve that.
-- Commercials: It seems unfair to make me watch six commercials in a row when perhaps I’ve tuned in to only watch a few minutes of TV. However, I would have to say the commercials were not as bad as imagined. You are accustomed to them, even if you know you are paying $15 a month for the service. The movie service only has one commercial breaks, which is nice.
-- The screen: The resolution was great, but as you may expect, it doesn’t work well outdoors in the bright light.
-- Battery life: It’s pretty good, but keep the charger handy. I watched 2:45 minutes straight of TV, and lost one bar of battery life, however, a few hours later, the phone was completely dead and that did not include making a single phone call, or going online. 

Posted in: Companies, Operators, AT&T, Verizon, Qualcomm, Entertainment, Mobile Video, Mobile TV

Tags: mediaflo,


EconWomen, Oct. 29, 2008 | Edison Ballroom | New York City Our panels are jam-packed with top women’s media executives. Register: http://econwomen.eventbrite.com

Related Research from Alacrastore.com
1 Response:
  • From Mike Gauba Tue 13 May 2008 06:53 PM

    This service will become yet another victim of convergence. AT&T;may have all the might in the world but has failed to realize that convergence is not ingrained into our psyches. The Mobile TV is struggling not for the lack of matured technology but because of the lack of adoption (usage). However, technology over awes us and blinds us from understanding the real reasons.

    I foresee people investing on Mobile TV enabled handsets as well subscribing to this service but little using it. Now the writer of the news item has a handset and an access to the service and I would be surprised if he would watch more than 10 minutes a day, over the coming months. I would be happy to receive an advice from him, if he does.

    Mobile TV has a future if it is stopped being positioned and run as an extension of the living room TV.  A Mobile TV is limited by the screen size and resolution, which limits the value delivered - especially while running the living room TV programs. The loss of the “video” value may be compensated by enhancing the audio value by designing programs for “on the go” needs. I foresee it succeeding as an enhanced radio with a video capability. This is just one part of the story and would be happy to discuss others too and can be contacted on

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

mocoNews.net is a news site covering the business of mobile content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

Tricia Duryee
Principal Correspondent

Matt Kapko
Senior Entertainment Reporter

Dianne See Morrison
Contributing Writer

James Quintana Pearce
Contributing Writer

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

FOBM Conference - Oct 28 | Edison Ballroom | NYC

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters