mocoNews.net - Unhealthily Obsessed with Mobile Content

Current Story

Rumors Surface On Apple’s SDK Plan; Sounds Similar To A Walled Garden

By Tricia Duryee - Fri 29 Feb 2008 10:50 AM PST

Developers may be disappointed next week when Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) lays out plans for the iPhone SDK. Some details are surfacing today on the kit that make it sound an awful lot like a carrier’s walled garden. The information will be especially disheartening to developers who were banking on Apple to be a less restricted avenue to distribute applications to consumers. The rumors were reported by iLounge, who spoke to a number of sources on the condition of anonymity.

The rumored details:

-- Apple will require that all mobile applications be distributed through iTunes. This rumor has already been circulating for some time. It’s surprising that the carriers are OK with this arrangement since often times they can demand a portion of proceeds from the sale of an application.

-- Apple will hand-pick the applications that will be put up for sale. “Our sources confirm that Apple will act as a gatekeeper for applications, deciding which are and are not worthy of release, and publishing only approved applications to the iTunes Store; a process that will less resemble the iTunes Store’s massive directory of podcasts than its sale of a limited variety of iPod Games,” iLounge reported. This is where developers may feel restricted just as they are today when trying to get on the carrier’s deck.

-- The iPhone and iPod Touch will not support accessories. This could limit creating applications that require keyboards and other add-ons.

iLounge also reported that Apple is expected to release a beta version of the SDK next week, with the actual kit shipping in June at Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference event in San Francisco. That rumor is also being reported by Apple 2.0. Additional announcements next week will include iPhone compatibility with Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) Exchange and Lotus Notes.

But then why are we surprised? Apple and walled garden: when was that NOT the case?

Posted in: Companies, Apple

Tags: iphone

Related Research from Alacrastore.com

6 Responses:
  • From Rich Fri 29 Feb 2008 01:10 PM

    We’ll they should not expect companies investing too much if there is a chance the application will get rejected and never be seen in the application shop.

  • From Jerry Sun 02 Mar 2008 09:17 AM

    The iPhone is not a Playpen for every Tom, Dick and Hacker to screw up.  I think it’s ridiculous that Developers are such whiners.

  • From Rich Mon 03 Mar 2008 08:18 AM

    Jerry I forgot that it is a magical device who’s power can only be weilded by chosen few.  Keep living in the 90’s.

  • From Fred Fri 07 Mar 2008 09:25 PM

    Rich

    You obviously dont have the ability to build anything worth selling. Do you think Apple is going to reject an application that has the potential to be a great release? Go post your complaints somewhere else, ‘Mr. 2000’

  • From Sam Fri 07 Mar 2008 09:26 PM

    I think Rich is just a gay loser

  • From Rich Sun 09 Mar 2008 07:58 AM

    Their model is almost identical to BREW run by Qualcomm for VZW Get it Now… except there are less than 2 million Iphones sold currently while Brew was running on over 45 million devices. Ultimately anyone could develop for Brew but it was up to Verizon to decide if the application would see any commercialization. I personally know a handful companies who have been burned by Verizon Biz Dev after developing their application for Brew....  and it was not becuase the applications were not worth selling. Some of these applciations were game-changing(VOIP/Social Networking/Messaging/Barcode) but were rejected becuase they competed or could potentially compete in some way with VZW’s network services.
    Apple is creating a walled garden enviornment which is no different from a business sense.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile/BB App
» Mobile/Wap Site

Send a News Tip

About

mocoNews.net is a news site covering the business of mobile content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Co-Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

Tricia Duryee
Principal Correspondent

Dianne See Morrison
Contributing Writer

James Quintana Pearce
Contributing Writer

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

EconAds Conference - The Economics of Ad Deals. Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008. The New World Stages, NYC

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters